Autor: admin
Datum objave: 19.12.2013
Share
Komentari:


Cultural exchange between Latin America and Europe is asymmetrical

William Levy,....Angelique Boyer,..... Sebastián Rulli ......

William Levy y Angelique Boyer, los más deseados

http://www.eldiario.ec/noticias-manabi-ecuador/297369-william-levy-y-angelique-boyer-los-mas-deseados/  

En México, los actores William Levy y Angelique Boyer son los más deseados por los televidentes, según arrojó la encuesta del Gabinete de Comunicación Estratégica (GCE).

El estudio, de acuerdo a lo compartido en el sitio de noticias Informador, se realizó para analizar las preferencias que tienen los mexicanos sobre los actores y actrices en la pantalla chica y reveló a los protagonistas más atractivos y sensuales.

Angelique Boyer es la favorita de los hombres al ser considerada la más sensual y sexy con un 10,4%, seguida de la actriz Ivonne Montero con 8,1%.

En el caso de Levy, el actor que ganó el título del más sexy, tuvo un 25,9%, dejando el segundo sitio al actor Sebastián Rulli con un 12,6%.

 

 

Cultural exchange between Latin America and Europe is asymmetrical

http://www.latinamericanpost.com/latampost/index.php/identity-culture/7011-cultural-exchange-between-latin-america-and-europe-is-asymmetrical

Colombia and Latin America are more receptive to what the French and European culture produce. However, they are not as receptive.

As said by François Rabelais University Professor Alfredo Gómez-Müller, during the 1st Colombian-France Meeting organized by a group of academics from the Universidad Nacional de Colombia and the  François Rabelais University.

Gómez-Müller says that in Europe the receptivity towards Latin-American culture is only present in some specialists groups but at a greater level there’s asymmetry.

Therefore, although significant the researcher calls them “limited expressions” such as the translation into French of the literary work of Gabriel García Márquez or exhibitions of sculptures of Fernando Botero on the streets of Paris and other cities.

“Besides the great notables, there is great unawareness of Colombian culture and Latin-American in general in Europe”, he said.

Professor María Enríquez, also from the François Rabelais University agreed with Gómez-Müller, and added that there is lack of cultural knowledge even amongst Latin-Americans.

This is evident in situations such as literary work circulation within the region. “I’ve been researching in Central America, a literature hardly disseminated in Europe but also not very well known in Colombia”, said Enríquez.

Critical voices from Europe

Gómez-Müller says that from inside Europe there have been critical voices towards the hegemonic attitudes of the French government towards cultural exchange.  

“In France there have been thinkers who highlight the perversity of certain Universalist speeches, where in reality there are certain elements of ethnocentrism”, he said.

They recognize the importance of cultural diversity and criticize the common belief of certain sectors, both in Europe as in Latin–America of assimilating European culture and civilization.

Professors Gómez-Müller and Enríquez shared these ideas during the 1st Colombia-France Meeting which was held between August 28 through 30 at the Museo Nacional de Colombia and Alianza Colombo-Francesa of Bogotá.

“Meetings like this one allows us to discuss, analyze and ponder over these types of ideological elements which may interfere in cultural exchange, as they prevent it from being fertile for both parties”, he said.

Agencia de Noticias UNAL

 

 

 

 

 

Pope says he is not a Marxist, but defends criticism of capitalism

Pope Francis says trickle-down economics do not help the poor, in a wide-ranging interview with Italian daily La Stampa

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/15/pope-francis-defends-criticism-of-capitalism-not-marxist

Pope Francis says trickle-down economics do not help the poor, in a wide-ranging interview with Italian daily La Stampa. The Argentinian pontiff said that the views were simply those of the church's social doctrine

Pope Francis has rejected accusations from rightwing Americans that his teaching is Marxist, defending his criticisms of the capitalist system and urging more attention be given to the poor in a wide-ranging interview.

In remarks to the Italian daily La Stampa, the Argentinian pontiff said the views he had espoused in his first apostolic exhortation last month – which the rightwing US radio host Rush Limbaugh attacked as "dramatically, embarrassingly, puzzlingly wrong" – were simply those of the church's social doctrine. Limbaugh described the pope's economics as "pure Marxism".

"The ideology of Marxism is wrong. But I have met many Marxists in my life who are good people, so I don't feel offended," Francis was quoted as saying. Defending his criticism of the "trickle-down" theory of economics, he added: "There was the promise that once the glass had become full it would overflow and the poor would benefit. But what happens is that when it's full to the brim, the glass magically grows, and thus nothing ever comes out for the poor ... I repeat: I did not talk as a specialist but according to the social doctrine of the church. And this does not mean being a Marxist."

 

In the 95-minute interview, conducted last Tuesday by the newspaper's Vatican correspondent, Andrea Tornielli, but published on Sunday, Francis touched on many of the issues that have dominated his first nine months as head of the Catholic church, such as the suffering of the poor and his reform agenda.

He also took the opportunity to knock down speculation that he was considering taking the radical step of creating a female cardinal, saying he had no idea where the suggestion had come from. "Women in the church must be valued, not 'clericalised'," he said. "Those thinking about women cardinals are suffering a bit from clericalism."

Francis, who was elected as the Catholic church's first Latin American pope in March, turns 77 on Tuesday, and will soon be celebrating his first Christmas as pontiff. He said that his thoughts during that time went above all to Christians living in the Holy Land, where he is expected to go next year.

He said he would like to mark the 50th anniversary of Paul VI's pioneering visit in 1964 – the first papal pilgrimage to the Holy Land and the first time a reigning pontiff had flown on a plane – along with Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I of Constantinople, the spiritual leader of the Orthodox Christian church.

He added that violence targeted at Christians in some parts of the world was forming the basis of what he called a new ecumenism of blood. "In some countries they kill Christians because they wear a cross or have a Bible, and before killing them they don't ask them if they're Anglican, Lutheran, Catholic or Orthodox," he said.

"Those who kill Christians don't ask you for an identity card in order to know what church you were baptised in. We must take this reality into account."

Christmas, said Francis, was a time of hope and tenderness that should shake people from indifference when they are confronted with suffering in the world. Railing against food wastage, he said that at a recent general audience he had seen a mother with a hungry baby who was crying and had told her to feed the child in spite of being in front of the pope. "She was modest," he said. "She did not want to breast-feed him in public while the pope was passing by … I would like to repeat what I said to that woman, to humanity: feed those who are hungry! May the hope and tenderness of Christmas shake us from indifference."

Francis, who has made no secret of his desire to change the way the Vatican is run, said the Council of Cardinals – the eight advisers he picked to suggest ways of implementing change – was at the stage of concrete proposals and would be raising their suggestions at their next meeting with him in February. "I am always present at the meetings … but I do not speak, I just listen, and this does me good," Francis told La Stampa.

Speaking of the scandal-plagued Institute for Religious Works (IOR), known as the Vatican bank, the pope said the mission to make it more transparent "was on the right road" but left a question mark hanging over what its future role would be. "Regarding the future of the IOR, we will see," he said. "The Vatican central bank, for example, is supposed to be Apsa [the Administration of the Patrimony of the Apostolic See, which manages the papacy's assets]. The IOR was established to help with works of religion, missions and the poor churches. Then it became what it is now."

Last week Moneyval, the Council of Europe's body monitoring safeguards against money laundering and terrorist funding, gave the Vatican a mixed report, welcoming efforts to clean up its financial institutions but expressing surprise that the Holy See's regulators had not carried out more inspections of the Vatican bank or of Apsa.

 

Asked about speculation that he may change the rules that bar remarried divorcees from receiving communion, Francis said: "The exclusion from communion of divorcees in a second marriage is not a punishment. It's good to remember that. But [contrary to speculation] I did not speak of this in the exhortation." The pope said marriage as a whole would be discussed in the coming months and many things would be examined in more detail and clarified.

The interview with La Stampa is not the first time Francis has chosen to speak to the media. In September, he talked extensively to Antonio Spadaro of La Civiltà Cattolica, an Italian Jesuit journal, while the newspaper La Repubblica published what it described as an interview with him in early October. The article was later taken down from the Vatican's website, with a spokesman, Federico Lombardi, saying: "The information in the interview is reliable on a general level, but not on the level of each individual point analysed."

The journalist, Eugenio Scalfari, later said he had neither recorded the interview nor taken notes but had tried to relay the pope's thoughts faithfully after their meetings. Tornielli, in a video on La Stampa's website, said he had recorded his papal interview.

 

 

 

 

Cuba-U.S. handshake — 13 years in the making

http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/12/10/3810669/cuba-us-handshake-13-years-in.html#storylink=cpy

By Jim Wyss

jwyss@MiamiHerald.com

When is a handshake not just a handshake? When it only happens every 13 years.

 

President Barack Obama and Cuban leader Raúl Castro briefly greeted each other Tuesday as they met at the memorial service for former South African President Nelson Mandela.

The two nations haven’t had diplomatic ties since 1960 and this is only the second time the leaders of the United States and the communist island are known to have pressed the flesh.

 Asked about the historic handshake, Castro told Colombia’s La FM radio it was “normal.”

“We’re civilized people,” he said.

As Obama bounded up the steps at FNB Stadium in Soweto, where the memorial was taking place, he bumped into the elderly Castro standing beside Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff. The two men smiled, shook hands and appeared to exchange a few words.

The entire encounter lasted less than 10 seconds.

“It would be really interesting if a lip reader could decipher what Raúl was telling Obama,” said Francisco Hernández, the president of the Cuban American National Foundation. “Other than that, I don’t think it was really anything of significance.”

The chance encounter comes amid small steps toward U.S.-Cuba rapprochement, including increased cooperation in drug-interdiction, rescue at sea and oil-spill planning, said Geoff Thale, who runs the Cuba program at the Washington Office on Latin America.

“In that context, [the handshake] is a modest but positive signal,” he said. “I don’t think people should go around reading too much into it — the embargo is not ending tomorrow.”

The White House said the meeting was not planned and didn’t go beyond an “exchange of greetings.” Obama went on to shake the hands of several of other heads of state at the memorial, which drew more than 90 leaders from around the world.

 

But the image of the two rivals meeting at the funeral of Mandela — who made his name as a peace-maker — resonated.

Britain’s The Telegraph newspaper called it “historic,” and former President Jimmy Carter told CNN it was “something significant” and that he hoped that it would be “an omen for the future.”

In a column in the Cubano1erPlano.com website, Havana-based analyst Jorge Gómez Barata said Mandela was mediating from beyond the grave.

To get the leaders of these two historically rival nations on the same stage, Gómez wrote, “was something only an exceptionally wise statesman like Nelson Mandela could pull off.”

Since taking office in 2009, Obama has tried to improve ties with Cuba, relaxing travel restrictions and acknowledging Havana’s moves to liberalize the economy.

 

During a recent visit to Miami, Obama said the U.S. needs to be “creative” and “thoughtful” as it updates its Cold War-era policies, and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry has echoed the sentiment.

In his speech Tuesday at the ceremony, Castro said he was ready to negotiate “with those who think differently.”

But major hurdles remain: Washington maintains a crippling economic embargo on the island and Cuba has been holding USAID contractor Alan Gross in detention for more than four years.

And whatever goodwill was generated by the handshake was tempered by finger-wagging from the dais.

During his address, Obama referred to Mandela by his Xhosa clan name and chastised nations like Cuba — though he did not mention any by name — that “claim solidarity with Madiba’s struggle for freedom, but do not tolerate dissent from their own people.”

 

As if on cue, Cuba arrested more than a dozen human rights activists Tuesday during protests to mark International Human Rights Day.

Not surprisingly, the South African encounter rattled some back in this hemisphere.

 

"It's nauseating and disheartening to see President Obama shake hands with Raúl Castro, who represents one of the world’s most repressive dictatorships,” U.S. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Miami, said in a statement. “It’s unfortunate that Cuban opposition leaders, who routinely risk their health and well-being in pursuit of their basic human rights, may be discouraged by the president acknowledging their oppressor.”

U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Florida, told The Hill newspaper that “If the President was going to shake his hand, he should have asked him about those basic freedoms Mandela was associated with that are denied in Cuba.”

And Rosa María Payá, the daughter of Cuban dissident Oswaldo Payá, who died in a mysterious automobile crash last year, blasted Obama for “greeting the dictator and the probable murderer of my father.”

But the fact that Obama acknowledged Castro, despite knowing he would be slammed at home, “is perhaps a telling sign that he may be willing to continue to implement small, incremental steps to engage with Cuba even if it comes with spending some political capital,” Peter Schechter, the director of the Washington, D.C.-based Atlantic Council’s Adrienne Arsht Latin America Center, said in a statement.

 

But sometimes a handshake is just a handshake.

 

In 1959, Vice President Richard Nixon shook Fidel’s hand shortly after the Cuban seized power. In 2000, then-President Bill Clinton also grasped the dictator’s hand at the United Nations, but that handshake wasn’t caught on film. And in 2009, Obama shook the hand of late Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez. None of those encounters, however, marked a sea-change in diplomatic relations.

“I couldn’t run away to keep from greeting him,” Fidel Castro explained after that 2000 encounter with Clinton, according to AFP news agency. “Just like with everyone else, I stopped for a few seconds and, with total dignity and courtesy, I greeted him…It would have been extravagant and rude to do anything else.”

On Tuesday, the White House indicated that it would have been impolite not to greet the Cuban leader and cautioned against reading more into the encounter.

“Obviously, we recognize that it’s been quite some time since the presidents of the United States and Cuba were even in the same place,” said Ben Rhodes, deputy National Security Adviser. “I think, though, that what people need to remember is what today was about: Nelson Mandela, one of the giants of the 20th century.”

Miami Herald Special Correspondent Geoff Hill contributed to this report from Johannesburg, South Africa.

 

1411
Kategorije: Fenomeni
Nek se čuje i Vaš glas
Vaše ime:
Vaša poruka:
Developed by LELOO. All rights reserved.